Thursday, February 1, 2018

Google Assistant adds new media capabilities ahead of HomePod release

The Google Assistant has been updated to make entertainment content more accessible to voice control. The company announced today that users can set alarms to play a favorite song, playlist or radio station instead of a loud, unpleasant alarm sound.

Users invoke this by speaking, “Hey Google, set an alarm for 6 a.m. that plays [insert favorite musician].” This is optimized for Google Play Music but will work with other services as well (e.g., Pandora).

Google added that you can now ask for TV show schedules using the Google Assistant. You can also set reminders so you can catch shows at specific dates and times. The Google Assistant can control TV programming as well.

This isn’t entirely new; users can “cast” content to their TVs from the Assistant on Netflix, YouTube TV and a couple of other sources. If you’ve linked your Netflix account to Google Home, you can now say “Watch XYZ show . . . “ and the Assistant will initiate that program from the point of last viewing. Google emphasizes that voice match allows separate users to do this and get personalized results.

These updates are part of Google’s ongoing feature race with Amazon Alexa, which announced it can send texts to Android phones. Both are trying to stay ahead of Apple, which plans to start selling the HomePod next Friday.

According to data from Consumer Intelligence Research Partners, Google Home accounted for about 40 percent of the units sold in the US during the holiday period. The firm’s analysis suggests that there are roughly 45 million smart speaker units in US homes today.

The post Google Assistant adds new media capabilities ahead of HomePod release appeared first on Search Engine Land.

The 5 Big Disruptions to Marketing in 2018

Join us for the 2018 update to Scott Brinker’s highly popular webinar on the disruptions affecting today’s marketers. Building on the 2017 edition, Scott will examine how the martech landscape has evolved over the past 12 months and outline what lies ahead for marketers in the next three to five years.

The marketing world is in the middle of five major disruptions that are reshaping the industry as we know it:

  1. Digital transformation.
  2. Microservices and APIs.
  3. Vertical competition.
  4. Digital everything.
  5. Artificial Intelligence.

These trends are dramatically altering the digital landscape in which businesses operate, changing how brands function internally and how they engage with customers.

Find out what’s changed, what’s ahead and how marketers can leverage these disruptions for a successful 2018. Register today for “The 5 Big Disruptions to Marketing in 2018,” produced by Digital Marketing Depot and sponsored by the MarTech Conference®.

The post The 5 Big Disruptions to Marketing in 2018 appeared first on Search Engine Land.

What’s going on with Google brand CPC?

In Q1 and Q2 of 2017, Merkle (my employer) reported on a positive trend for advertisers that showed a decline in brand cost per click (CPC) year over year. The CPC of brand terms is often determined by Google’s algorithm as opposed to the competitive landscape, so brands are often left to Google’s mercy in determining the price paid for this traffic.

In the case of the mid-2017 decline, it seems advertisers were benefiting from Google’s May ad rank change, which appeared to reduce first-page and top-of-page minimum bids in the search results. However, despite a continued decline in minimum bid estimates, brand CPC rebounded sharply in Q4.

What gives?

Brand CPC up massively in Q4

Looking at the data featured in the Merkle Q4 digital marketing report, we find brand CPC went from a 13 percent year-over-year decline in Q3 to a 23 percent increase in Q4, by far the largest increase of the past seven quarters:

The data shows the decline in cost per click seems to line up chronologically with Google’s May ad rank update, which appeared to send brand first and top-of-page minimum bid estimates down while sending non-brand estimates up.

These trends continued through the end of 2017, with non-brand continuing on an upward trajectory and brand continuing downward:

Non-brand CPC growth continued to accelerate through the end of the year in concert with the increase in minimum bid estimates, so why did brand CPC experience such a sharp reversal? If Google took corrective action to adjust the price paid for brand cost per click, it would not be the first time.

Google’s history of algorithm adjustments as corrections

Travel back with me to the year 2011. At the beginning of the year, advertisers started seeing brand CPCs fall precipitously, finally bottoming out in 2012 around 30 percent to 40 percent lower than the historical average.

Throughout the period of decline, Google released a number of ad extensions, notably Enhanced Sitelinks in February 2012, which gave ads in top positions increased prominence in the search results. These new bells and whistles naturally increased CTR, resulting in better quality assessments for keywords in top positions, particularly brand keywords.

When CPCs started increasing again in the back half of 2012, Google gave advertisers the explanation it was simply a correction for what had been the unintended consequences of rolling out extensions without properly adjusting expected CTR for those ads that feature them.

Could a similar correction be in the works, with Google trying to mitigate the loss in CPC that seemed to accompany its May ad rank change? It’s certainly possible.

A more recent correction happened in the opposite direction after a June 2016 shift sent phone brand CPC soaring. Within days of a Merkle blog highlighting the increase, phone brand CPCs quickly declined to even lower levels than prior to the increase, as shown here:

Google has at times rolled out changes impacting brand CPC in unintended ways, both upward and downward, and has made moves following those shifts to correct course. It sure seems like the rapid increase in brand CPC during the final quarter of 2017 might have been a similar correction.

Conclusion

In Q4 2017, year-over-year CPC growth accelerated across the board, including brand and non-brand campaigns, shopping, text ads, desktop and mobile. In the case of brand keywords, this marks a significant reversal of the brand CPC declines observed in Q3.

As mentioned at the beginning of this post, brands are largely at the mercy of Google’s algorithm in terms of the price of branded traffic, but advertisers can take some steps toward minimizing the potential for increased cost per click.

Testing reductions in bids for brand keywords to assess the impact on traffic can give a clearer picture how high bids need to be in order to land top spots for most searches. Additionally, taking into account the amount of organic traffic coming from branded keywords at different bid levels can give a fuller picture of how many visits and orders brands might give up at various bid levels.

In the big scheme of things, most brands will continue to pay to ensure ads are featured in position one for as many brand searches as possible. This allows advertisers to control messaging, play defense against competitors and minimize the potential for lost traffic from users looking for brand names.

Will brand CPCs continue to climb alongside non-brand? The first couple of weeks in 2018 seem to indicate it’s likely. However, Google tends to change course frequently, so it’s possible that will happen yet again.

The post What’s going on with Google brand CPC? appeared first on Search Engine Land.

Restaurant owners can now edit menu listings in Google My Business

Google My Business announced a new update on Thursday that is sure to make many restaurant owners happy.

Restaurant owners who are managing their own Google My Business (GMB) listings can now access a new editor to create and edit the menus that may display in their listings in Google mobile search results.

The editor is available in the Info tab in the Google My Business dashboard. This is also where owners have been able to edit links to their menus. With the editor, owners can add and edit titles, descriptions and prices of their menu items. Menus can also be broken out into sections for appetizers, entrees and desserts, for example.

Prior to this update, Google only offered the ability to create and edit structured menus via the Google My Business API or third-party menu services. Restaurants that are connected to a third-party provider will not have access to the editor.

This feature is available in English markets only at this time.

Last year, Google added menu tabs to local panel listings in the search results for some restaurants and began adding menus as far back as 2014.

The post Restaurant owners can now edit menu listings in Google My Business appeared first on Search Engine Land.

What the ROAS? A practical guide to improving return on ad spend

Do you want to improve your paid search campaigns? There are a lot of paid search metrics, but one of the most useful and most underused is return on ad spend (ROAS).

One of the main points behind online advertising is to drive sales for your business. This is particularly true when it comes to paid search. Most paid search campaigns are targeting potential customers who are fairly low in the funnel. A paid search click usually costs more than a display or paid social click, but it’s worth having if that click turns into a paying customer.

However, just because you are targeting bottom-of-the-funnel traffic, that doesn’t mean that every element of your paid search campaigns is a good investment.

This is where ROAS comes into play. One of the best things about paid search advertising is the ability to connect what you spend on a campaign, ad or keyword to how much new revenue is generated. With a little extra effort, you can connect all the dots and use ROAS to identify which aspect of your paid search advertising deserves more of your budget and which needs work.

Figuring out your ROAS

The key to using ROAS to improve the performance of your paid search campaigns is great conversion and sales tracking. After all, if you don’t know which campaigns, ad groups, ads and keywords are producing which conversions and sales, you can’t exactly calculate and use your ROAS.

Fortunately, most paid search platforms make it pretty easy to track conversions and sales. For example, if you’re running an e-commerce company, you can easily assign a conversion value to transactions and directly view the value a particular campaign element produces in AdWords:

However, ROAS isn’t just a metric for e-commerce businesses. For example, most conversion types can be directly tracked in AdWords, and with the right tracking set up (UTM parameters work great for this), you can follow data in a CRM like Salesforce.

As those conversions turn into sales, you can use this AdWords-Salesforce integration to pass your sales and revenue data back into AdWords for easy tracking and analysis.

Using your ROAS data

Sadly, most marketing decisions are not made using ROAS data. At my company, we’ve audited thousands of paid search accounts and found that only 29 percent of advertisers are tracking conversions effectively — let alone ROAS!

Using metrics like click or conversion data to guide your marketing isn’t a bad thing, but without ROAS data, you can end up making decisions that improve your metrics and hurt profitability.

The problem with clicks

Here’s an example of not using ROAS data in decision-making.

Let’s imagine that you sell hot tubs. Your average hot tub sells for $3,500 and has a 50 percent profit margin. In an effort to boost sales, you’ve been running five paid search campaigns that have yielded the following results:

If you had to pick a campaign to keep investing in, which would it be? The obvious choice here is campaign #3: it has the highest click-through rate and the cheapest cost per click.

However, while campaign #3 drives the most clicks at the lowest cost, we really don’t know much about the quality of those clicks. For example, if campaign #3 is driving a lot of traffic because you are bidding on the broad match keyword “hot tub,” you could be getting all sorts of irrelevant clicks.

The problem with conversions

To address our traffic quality issue, let’s take a look at how those clicks are converting:

As you can see, campaign #3 has a relatively poor conversion rate (CR). However, campaign #3 also drives so many cheap clicks that it still has the lowest cost per lead (CPL) of the group by a considerable margin.

Using this data, it still looks like campaign #3 is worth the investment. Sure, it could probably use a little optimization, but it clearly outperforms the rest of your campaigns.

Or does it?

Leads are nice, but a lead is not a sale. Conversion data only tells us how good a campaign is at getting people into our funnel; it doesn’t tell us anything about how well a campaign produces new revenue.

A ROAS reality check

To really answer the “is this campaign profitable?” question, we need to take a look at ROAS:

Now which campaign would you invest in?

Although Campaign 3 had the best click and conversion stats, it has a terrible sales rate (SR) and cost per sale (CPS). In fact, with your 50 percent profit margin, every sale from Campaign 3 actually costs you money. In contrast, Campaign 4 is incredibly profitable. Sure, it had lousy click and conversion stats, but when it comes to profit, it’s the obvious choice.

Obviously, this is a bit of a manufactured scenario, but it makes an important point. Click and conversion data can help you identify problem areas in your marketing, ad or keyword campaigns.  But if a campaign is not producing a good ROAS, something needs to change.

Using your ROAS

By now, I hope I’ve convinced you to use ROAS to evaluate and optimize your paid search campaigns. The question now is, how? To answer that, let’s work through another example.

In this scenario, let’s say you run a whale-watching business. It is a side business, and your boat is kind of small, so you can only take one person out at a time. But you charge $150 for each one-hour expedition and make around 20 trips a month at a 50 percent profit margin, so it’s not a bad gig.

However, after hearing countless passengers say you should do this full time, you decide to finally bite the bullet. You rent an office, hire a part-time assistant and discover your expenses are running $2,000 a month, which is more expensive than you initially thought.

All of sudden, you are losing $500 a month. You need to sell more tickets, fast!

To bring in more business, you start running paid search campaigns. But how do you know whether a campaign, ad group, ad or keyword is working? Let’s see how we can use ROAS to answer that question.

1x return on ad spend

Let’s say you charge $150 a ticket. If it costs $150 to bring in a new sale, you should at least be breaking even, right? Unfortunately, that’s not how it works. When every trip costs you $75 in gas plus wear and tear, a 1x ROAS leaves you deeper in the hole with every purchase.

Plus, you still have that $500 monthly expense hole to dig yourself out of, so any campaign element producing a 1x ROAS needs some work or to be eliminated entirely.

2x return on ad spend

If a 1x ROAS doesn’t cut it, what about a 2x ROAS? You make $75 on every sale, so if you spend $75 on marketing, you’ll be okay, right? Sadly, still not the case. If all you do is break even on every trip, you will never make any money. In fact, you’ll never even be able to pay off that $500 deficit.

Since the whole point of marketing your business is to overcome deficits and make money, any campaign element with a 2x ROAS could probably use some work. I’d put more of a priority on 1x elements, but once those are working better, your 2x elements could use some attention.

3x return on ad spend

At a 3x ROAS, things start to make a lot more sense. If you can drive over 20 extra sales with your marketing at a 3x ROAS, you’ll actually be making money!

You won’t be rolling in cash at a 3x ROAS, but at least you’re in the black. In general, I recommend that you shoot for a minimum of a 3x ROAS in your marketing campaigns.

4x return on ad spend

Once you hit a 4x ROAS, things usually start to add up. At this level of return, you only need 14 sales to cover all of your fixed and variable expenses and start making money.

Getting and keeping every element of your paid search marketing campaigns at this level is a worthy goal, although it’s probably a bit impractical. But if your campaign is on the whole at a 4x ROAS, you’re probably doing okay.

5x+ return on ad spend

At a 5x or higher ROAS, your paid search campaigns are running well enough that you can probably start growing your business.

After about 12 sales, you are turning a decent profit, which should enable you to get a bigger boat and book larger groups. Both of these things will increase your profitability.

If we lived in a perfect world,  every element of your campaigns would perform at this level, but if your campaign as a whole is a 5x or better ROAS, you’re probably okay.

Using ROAS

Obviously, this is another highly specific scenario, but it illustrates a fairly consistent rule of thumb: Shoot for a 4x ROAS with most paid search campaigns and campaign elements.

Any campaign element with a ROAS of less than 3x probably needs work. How important it is to work on any given element will depend on how much it’s costing you, but in most situations, you need at least a 3x ROAS to break even.

Of course, this rule doesn’t cleanly apply to “branding”-type campaigns, but most paid search campaigns don’t fall into this category. Paid search marketing is usually expensive, low-funnel marketing, so if your overall ROAS isn’t at least 4x, your marketing is probably on life support.

When it comes to specific elements of your campaigns, ROAS is also a handy triage tool. As you can probably imagine, you’ll want to look at a big enough data set to fairly evaluate a given campaign (at least 100 clicks, at a bare minimum), but with sufficient data, you can use this rule of thumb to quickly identify campaign elements that need to be improved, eliminated or grown.

Conclusion

ROAS is often seen as an e-commerce metric, but in reality, it’s one of the most valuable and yet least-used paid search metrics out there. Yes, it does take a little extra work to get tracking set up, but the information is worth it.

Once you have ROAS tracking set up, you actually have to use it to improve your campaigns. The trick here is knowing what ROAS data tells you about the end performance of your campaign elements and how to use that information to identify elements that need to be improved. Fortunately, after reading through this article, you should have a good sense of how to interpret and use your ROAS data.

Your specific goals may vary, but by using ROAS to guide your campaign decisions, you’ll be making decisions that affect what matters most — making money!

The post What the ROAS? A practical guide to improving return on ad spend appeared first on Search Engine Land.

Carter G. Woodson Google doodle honors scholar who started Black History Month

To kick off Black History Month, today’s Google doodle pays homage to Dr. Carter G. Woodson —  the scholar who, in February 1926, first devised an African-American studies program.

Known as the Father of Black History, Dr. Woodson committed his life to African-American studies and the preservation of African-American history. It was his week-long event promoting African-American studies that eventually became Black History Month.

According to Google, Dr. Woodson chose February to focus on African-American studies because it is the birth month of both abolitionist Frederick Douglass and President Abraham Lincoln.

Born in New Canton, Virginia, in 1875, Dr. Woodson was the son of former slaves Anne Eliza and James Henry Woodson. He was able to enter high school in 1895 and eventually earned a master’s degree from the University of Chicago. He continued his studies and became the second African-American to receive his doctorate from Harvard University.

From Dr. Carter G. Woodson African American Museum website:

In 1915, he and friends established the Association for the Study of Negro Life and History. A year later, the Journal of Negro History began quarterly publication. Dr. Woodson was the founder of Associated Publishers, the founder and editor of the Negro History Bulletin, and the author of more than 30 books. His best known publication is “The Mis-Education of the Negro,” originally published in 1933 and still pertinent today.

The doodle was designed by Virginia-based illustrator Shannon Wright, whose work has appeared in numerous publications, including The New York Times, Mother Jones and TIME Magazine. It leads to a search for “Carter G. Woodson” and features the scholar in his library with images of African-American leaders at his side.

“Woodson’s commitment to achieve an education for himself and spread awareness and pride in Black history inspired me and continues to do so in so many ways,” writes Google’s director of brand marketing, Sherice Torres on the Google Doodle Blog, “When I voiced my ambition to go to Harvard, I was told by teachers, guidance counselors, and even some family members that people like me didn’t go to schools like that.”

An active member of the Black Googlers Network, Torres says it was American leaders like Dr. Woodson who gave her the confidence to follow her dreams and achieve more than she ever imagined.

The post Carter G. Woodson Google doodle honors scholar who started Black History Month appeared first on Search Engine Land.

Bing Ads rolls out multiuser access with single sign-on

Shortly after launching the Multi-Linking feature this past fall to help users managing multiple accounts, Bing Ads is now offering an additional way to manage multiple accounts easily.

Multi-User Access will allow users to have one email and password to access all of the Bing Ads accounts they manage. The single login will further streamline switching between different clients while eliminating the need for multiple logins.

Upon login, the accounts an email has access to will be listed.

Image from Bing Ads

Available accounts can also be accessed from a drop-down menu available in the upper right beneath the login credentials. In addition, users can manage defaults and remove their access.

How to access the feature

If you currently access accounts via multiple logins, you can contact Bing Ads support to have them consolidated under one login. Or you can simply start accepting user invitation requests to the login you wish to use.

An important note is that Bing Ads API version 11 does not yet support this feature, so account access will still need to be done via the original login used. This will be updated in Version 12.

The post Bing Ads rolls out multiuser access with single sign-on appeared first on Search Engine Land.