Thursday, March 2, 2017

Should you bother rewriting your ads?

When it comes to paid search, there is a lot to optimize. Amidst all of the keywords, bidding and landing page refinements you have to do on a regular basis, it can be easy to wonder, “Does my ad copy actually make a difference?”

To make matters worse, there’s nothing exciting about tweaking ad copy. Redesigning a landing page is like creating a piece of art. Eliminating keywords can dramatically cut your cost-per-conversion. But ad copy? Does tweaking a word here or there really make a difference?

As it turns out, the answer is a resounding, “Yes!”

The fact of the matter is, you can have the best targeting and landing pages in the world, but if you’re showing the wrong ad copy to the right audience, no one is going to click on your ads. On the other hand, with the right ad copy, you can get more clicks and more of the right clicks on your ads.

Ad copy matters

We recently took on a new client who was getting decent results from their AdWords campaigns. Decent, but not great. By and large, they had most of the right elements in place… with one exception:

Ad copy.

Now, since everything else was set up right, they were about break-even with their campaigns. However, after taking a look at their ad copy, we knew they could do a lot better than simply “breaking even.”

So, we rebooted their ad copy. We overhauled everything — CTAs, title case, special characters and more — and ensured that their revised text ads were pointing to landing pages that closely matched the new messaging.

It was a fairly simple change, but the results were truly impressive:

In fact, the new ad copy performed so much better that it increased conversion rates (not just click-through rates) by 400 percent. And the cost-per-conversion fell from well over $2,000 to just under $60.

Not too shabby for a few hours’ work.

Now obviously, not every business will get these sorts of results from a few ad copy tweaks. But rewriting and testing your ad copy can be one of the most valuable paid search optimizations you can do.

Rewriting your ad copy

Knowing that rewriting ad copy is important and knowing how to effectively rewrite your ad copy are two entirely different things. Hopefully, I’ve convinced you that you should be rewriting your ad copy, but let’s take a look at how to approach an ad copy rewrite.

In essence, great text ad copy does three things:

1. It makes people feel something

People don’t buy for logical reasons. They buy for emotional reasons. In fact, 90 percent of the decision-making process happens subconsciously. So, if you want people to respond to your ads, your ads need to resonate with or evoke an emotion in your target audience.

The good news is, people search online and see your ads because they have a problem they need solved. Problems make us feel uncomfortable and uncertain, which are great emotions to play on.

For example, if you’ve got a sudden, unexpected international business trip and your passport has expired, you might type “renew passport” into Google:

At this point, you’ve got two problems: 1) you need your passport fast; and 2) you’re probably pretty busy getting ready for your trip, so you can’t really afford to spend hours in line at the passport office.

Is it any wonder that these ads address both of those problems?

“Traveling and Need to Renew Fast?” That’s you! “No Waiting in Line Or Red Tape.” Yep, you again!

Now, if your trip is next week, which ad do you think you’ll be most likely to click? If I had to guess, I’d bet you’d pick the second one. After all, you are in such a time crunch that you are probably pretty stressed about getting your passport back in time.

Ad #2 addresses your biggest problem directly in their copy (“Get Your Passport in as Little as 24 Hours”), so they are much more likely to get your click.

Do you see how this works?

If people resonate with your ad copy because it addresses their real problem, they’ll immediately feel a sense of relief and connection. That sense of relief and connection earns clicks. So, if you want people to click on your ads, write copy that speaks to the problem that prompted their original search.

2. It passes the logic gut-check

Now, while people buy because of emotion, most people know that purely emotional decisions are often bad decisions. In other words, they want to feel like they are making a logical, rational decision when they click, convert or buy.

But honestly, the rationale behind a decision is less important than how rational a person feels about their decision.

When it comes to ad copy, your audience’s need to feel like they are making sound, rational decisions means your ad copy needs to pass a “logic gut-check.” Typically, most people who are looking at your ad are looking for signs that clicking on your ad is a logical decision. They might not realize what they are doing, but they are essentially screening for fishy or misleading ad copy.

Fortunately, it’s fairly easy to pass this logic gut-check — provided that you know what your audience is screening for.

For example, say you’re running a business, and your CEO has decided that the company needs some project management software. She tasks you with finding a solution, so you search for “project management software” on Google:

Since your boss expects you to find a high-quality, reliable solution, you aren’t looking for an ad that “feels right.” You’re running a logic gut-check on each of these ads.

While price will probably be a factor in your long-term decision, odds are that what you are screening for on your initial search is a product with a proven track record that’s also easy to learn and use.

And look at that! Each of these ads addresses those points to one degree or another.

“Preferred by 1.5 million users.” Sounds like a proven track record to me. “Powerful and Very Easy-To-Use.” Well, that hits the “easy to learn and use” concern on the head. “7,000,000 people tried Smartsheet.” Another great track record claim, it would seem.

Depending on exactly where your priorities lie, any of these ads might stand out to you, but assuming that track record and ease of use are your highest priorities, which ad do you think you’ll click on?

There’s a good chance you’ll pick ad #2.

After all, neither ad #1 nor ad #3 mention ease of use. Ad #2 mentions both ease of use and a proven track record (“Powerful and Very Easy-To-Use” in the headline and “Proven over 15+ years of real-world use” in the subhead).

In fact, ad #3 says that “7,000,000 people tried Smartsheet.” But did they actually keep using it? Maybe it’s hard to use, so people try it and then give up. Otherwise, wouldn’t Smartsheet say that 7,000,000 use their product?

Uh-oh. Looks like ad #3 fails the logic gut-check.

Do you see how important it is to pass the logic gut-check? People won’t necessarily click just because you fit their screening criteria, but if your ad sets off logical alarms, your target audience is going to be a lot less likely to click on your ad.

3. It catches their eye

Now, it might seem a bit odd to call a text ad “eye-catching,” but if people don’t notice your ad, they certainly won’t click on it. Here again, your ad needs to get past another filter. But this time, it’s a filter called “selective attention.”

In a nutshell, selective attention is how our brains deal with all the chaos in the world around us. Instead of paying attention to everything all at once, the brain looks for things that are familiar or relevant to the task at hand and only pays attention to those things.

For example, remember that time when you purchased a new car and suddenly started seeing that make and model everywhere? That’s selective perception.

The same idea applies to ad copy.

When someone searches online, the keywords associated with their search become a high priority to the brain. The brain has to process an awful lot of search results on the page, so it uses selective attention to filter for truly relevant results.

If the brain sees one of the high-priority keywords it’s searching for, that search result is deemed to be relevant, and the brain pays attention to it. Otherwise, the brain ignores it and moves on.

Search engines like Google know how important selective perception is to their search engine result pages (SERPs). After all, they are in the business of delivering relevant results, so it’s in their best interest to make it as obvious as possible to your brain that your SERP is relevant to your query.

This is why Google bolds your keywords in the SERP:

Check out those keywords. It’s like Google is telling your brain, “Look at this relevant ad!”

Since Google doesn’t allow you to include eye-catching images or make your ad copy more eye-catching by using unusual punctuation or capitalization, selective attention is the only real way to make your ads stand out to your audience.

To take advantage of selective attention, your ad copy needs to include the keywords your potential customers are subconsciously screening for. This is one of the reasons why dynamic keyword insertion can improve click-through rates.

The better your ad copy matches what your audience is searching for, the more likely they are to read and click on your ad.

Summary

Rewriting and testing your ad copy may not be the most glamorous way to improve your paid search campaigns, but it can be an incredibly effective way to get more bang from your budget.

If you want to write ads that really shine, though, you have to think about your audience in detail.

What problem drove them to search online? What sort of logic gut-check are they running your ad through? What keywords are their brains scanning for? Once you’ve answered these questions, you’ll be well-equipped to write text ads that truly shine.

The post Should you bother rewriting your ads? appeared first on Search Engine Land.

Wednesday, March 1, 2017

6 steps to creating high converting native ads

Reaching your target audience and gaining traction and interest with native ads is far more complex than simply slapping up an ad that will integrate with a medium. Make sure your native ads are working for you. With the threat of ad blocking, creating native ads the right way is growing in importance.

According to industry research, if ad blocking remains at its current level across the board, publishers will lose $35 billion by 2020. One of the best ways publishers and marketers can combat this hold on digital advertising is to branch into native ads with content that’s done correctly. But how?

Follow this simple, 6-step guide from Experts Exchange to learn how to create successful native ad campaigns. Visit Digital Marketing Depot to download your copy.

The post 6 steps to creating high converting native ads appeared first on Search Engine Land.

SearchCap: DMOZ shutting, AdWords price extensions expands & Bing Ads editor for Mac

searchcap-header-v2-scap

Below is what happened in search today, as reported on Search Engine Land and from other places across the web.

From Search Engine Land:

Recent Headlines From Marketing Land, Our Sister Site Dedicated To Internet Marketing:

Search News From Around The Web:

Local & Maps

Link Building

Searching

SEO

SEM / Paid Search

Search Marketing

The post SearchCap: DMOZ shutting, AdWords price extensions expands & Bing Ads editor for Mac appeared first on Search Engine Land.

Bing Ads Editor for Mac is now available to everyone

After running in beta in the US since last June, Bing Ads Editor is now available globally.

The Mac version of the desktop editing tool for Bing Ads campaigns has been at the top of advertisers’ feature requests lists for years. The Mac version has parity with the Windows desktop editor, including the ability to manage multiple accounts and copy and paste items across accounts.

Anyone who’s tried knows that making multiple updates to campaigns through the web interface can be very slow going (as it is with AdWords). That’s where the desktop tools come in. Bing Ads Editor enables advertisers to build out campaigns and make several changes at once. Advertisers can also make edits to campaigns before pushing them live.

The availability of a desktop editor for Mac could increase adoption of Bing Ads by Mac-heavy advertisers and agencies. The beta has largely been well received by advertisers, and Bing says the Mac Editor is now faster than it was in beta.

Advertisers can download Bing Ads Editor for Mac here.

The post Bing Ads Editor for Mac is now available to everyone appeared first on Search Engine Land.

The value of search across the modern consumer decision journey

As disruptive technologies reshape the digital marketing landscape, advertisers are scrambling to stay relevant and top of mind with consumers. In this shifting landscape, paid search continues to evolve outside of the traditional search format as an omnipresent influencer throughout the entire consumer decision journey.

For years, search marketers have obsessed over bottom-of-the-funnel activity for its seemingly higher CTRs and conversion rates, in part fueled by last-click attribution. I’ve certainly been guilty of obsessing about conversions and bottom-of-the-funnel tactics, because they would win me incremental search budget in the future.

But most marketers today agree that it is essential for a brand to appear at all stages of the funnel — and thanks to some new findings from the Bing Ads research team, we now have even more visibility and hard data to show how paid search is driving brand affinity and recall across the decision journey.

Deconstructing modern decision journeys & query paths

In many ways, today’s search marketers must unlearn some old practices and adopt a new mindset, delving deeper into individual customer journeys and query paths. Paid search is no longer a product with broad KPIs, such as conversions and clicks. Clicks are no longer clicks; they represent individual consumers on specific journeys.

Search today gives us intelligence through each stage of the decision journey, not just bottom-of-funnel conversions. To begin, let’s dissect the modern decision journey and query path.

There are five distinct stages within a consumer’s decision journey: initiation, research, comparison, transaction and experience. For different types of journeys, each stage has a different level of importance that depends on cost of failure, frequency of purchase, cost and complexity of the task and the type of shopper.

Each journey is highly personalized and will vary in length and importance. Whether a consumer is hopping online to replace a broken baby bouncy chair or researching a new hot water heater after taking yet another freezing cold shower, marketers must reach the right person at the right moment with the right message.

According to a recent research study by Forrester, 71 percent of consumers begin their journeys by using a search engine to discover new products and services (initiation), and 74 percent reported using a search engine for consideration and purchasing (research, comparison, transaction).

These searches span many different types of queries:

  • Brand searches include a specific brand or product name. For example, Fischer-Price is the brand, and product searches could include Little People or Power Wheels.
  • Competitor brand searches include your competitors’ brands or products. This is an opportunity for your brand to appear through conquest advertising. For Fischer-Price, these terms could include Exersaucer, Baby Einstein or Safety First.
  • Category searches include broad search terms that are not product- or brand-specific, such as “baby activity center,” “bouncer chair” or “jumpers.”
  • Tangential searches include searches that are related to a given journey, but not in exactly the same category. For instance, if I’m searching for baby activity chairs, a tangential search could be for “baby gates” or “childproofing products.”

Research findings: Non-brand searches are key to starting a journey

While traditional search has always placed a premium on brand keywords, the Bing Ads research team has uncovered new insights on the role of non-brand search terms within today’s journeys.

Utsav Biswas, Jacquelyn Krones and Judson Randolph of the Bing Ads research team conducted a Brand Impact Study on usage data from a major US auto retailer and determined that 72 percent of brand ad clicks (which includes category, competitor and tangential searches) had a non-brand keyword that preceded the brand click. This indicates that retailers who do not run non-brand keywords throughout multiple stages of decision journeys are missing out on a high majority of relevant searches and are leaving wide open spaces for their competitors.

Additionally, the research showed that consumers who are exposed to a brand ad on a category or competitor query were 30 percent more likely to do a branded search and on average had a 15 percent higher conversion rate than consumers who were not exposed to the brand ad. Having a branded ad appear in category and competitor brand queries improved brand affinity and recall and increased the propensity for future brand searches.

Research findings: Incremental awareness and perception value

The Bing Ads research team also completed a study in Q3 2016 with a leader in the automotive insurance vertical to measure brand awareness and perception based on exposure to ads within the search results pages. The key learning from this study was that searchers on Bing who saw a branded ad for non-branded search queries showed a statistically significant increase in brand awareness, perception and purchase intent.

After being exposed to a branded ad, searchers indicated a 24 percent lift in unaided awareness, a 28 percent lift in purchase intent and a 30 percent lift in viewing the retailer as a market leader. Brand awareness further improved when searchers clicked through on the ad and were taken to the brand’s landing page.

Although search marketers have long assumed some level of brand awareness in search, it is the amount of brand awareness shown here that proves impressive and indicates the importance of staying present throughout each stage of a journey.

Search continues to dominate conversion activity

As search continues to evolve and play integrated roles farther up the funnel, it still dominates within bottom-of-funnel conversion activity. According to a Forrester Consumer Technographics survey from Q1 2016, 49 percent of consumers reported that they rely on search to inform purchase decisions, and 19 percent of respondents identified search engines as the most influential source in driving their purchase decisions. In partnership with Pepperjam and Bing Ads, an attribution analysis study found that 58 percent of the time search is the final or only event within a purchase path, showing the value that search brings at the end of the decision journey.

Last month, I noted how desktop search is still converting at a higher rate than mobile search, with 80 percent of US retail e-commerce sales occurring on a desktop device. Similarly, Marin Software’s Q4 2016 Performance Marketer Benchmark Report shows the ability of search to convert visitors, especially when compared to social and display campaigns.

Of course, this doesn’t mean to only advertise on search. A 2015 case study found that paid search conversion rates increased up to 52 percent when search and display ads were running simultaneously. Similarly, Marin Software’s multiplier effect report showed that consumers who clicked on search and social ads were 2x more likely to convert and spend more.

Now is a great time to approach paid search with a fresh view, looking at the value of reaching the consumer across the entire journey. A view that replaces clicks with individual consumers, that replaces linear query paths with holistic brand experiences and ultimately replaces a single conversion with lifetime value and brand loyalty.

The post The value of search across the modern consumer decision journey appeared first on Search Engine Land.

Do you know what a mobile crawl of your site looks like?

The Mobile First Crawl Will Now Be Top Priority

If you follow the world of Google and search at all, you’ve heard about Google’s intent to switch to a mobile-first index. In this post, I’m going to briefly review the main points we know about Google’s plans for this new index, but I’m going to go further and detail what we found in a mobile-specific crawl we did of one website.

Based on this data, I’ll also talk about the implications of the switch and some of the challenges that Google faces with this process.

Key points about a mobile-first index

If you’ve already read about Google’s impending switch to a mobile-first index, you can jump down to the site analysis below. If not, here are some of the key statements from the Google announcement:

Today, most people are searching on Google using a mobile device. However, our ranking systems still typically look at the desktop version of a page’s content to evaluate its relevance to the user. This can cause issues when the mobile page has less content than the desktop page because our algorithms are not evaluating the actual page that is seen by a mobile searcher.

This situation occurs when publishers are trying to make their mobile site more streamlined, so they don’t include all the content from their desktop version. It’s bad for Google, though, because they currently rank sites based on a desktop crawl — and they may be sending someone to a mobile page that doesn’t have the content the user is looking for.

You Need Content to be Present to Rank It!

While Google has traditionally told people that content that is not immediately visible to users on page load will not be counted as much as other content, they’ve reversed direction on that position because of the needs of the mobile UX:

Content in Dropdowns Will Be Ranked by Google

Be careful to design this in a way that will still allow Google to see the content. Basically, if it’s not in the rendered Document Object Model (DOM), Google can’t see it.

Google Doesn't Click On Page Elements

If you have a responsive site or a dynamic serving site where the primary content and markup is equivalent across mobile and desktop, you shouldn’t have to change anything.

While this is true, don’t overlook this key part of the phrase: “where the primary content and markup is equivalent across mobile and desktop.”

Make sure to serve structured markup for both the desktop and mobile version. … When adding structured data to a mobile site, avoid adding large amounts of markup that isn’t relevant to the specific information content of each document.

This post made it really clear that structured data remains a big part of Google’s plans. Structured data makes Google’s job easier. While they don’t offer ranking benefits for using it, some types of markup do alter the presentation of your content in the SERPs (in a good way), and it increases Google’s chances of correctly interpreting the content on your pages.

Sites do not have to make changes to their canonical links; we’ll continue to use these links as guides to serve the appropriate results to a user searching on desktop or mobile.

Thanks for small favors! Actually, Google rightly recognizes that it would be a nightmare for them to try to get publishers to reverse the direction of all these “switchboard tag” links.

Two other key points:

Google is trying to make the change as minimally disruptive as possible:

Google is Aiming For a Quality Neutral Rollout

The mobile web does a lot less interlinking. What that means is that the mobile version of your site probably has far fewer links than the desktop version. So will Google stop using links? Here is what Gary Illyes had to say about that:

Will Links Still Count?

Some great posts with more commentary on this update:

  1. Google begins mobile-first indexing, using mobile content for all search rankings
  2. FAQ: All about the Google mobile-first index
  3. Google’s Mobile First Indexing Change: Everything SEOs Need to Know by Jennifer Slegg
  4. Mobile-First Unanswered Questions by Jenny Halasz

A case study of a mobile-first crawl

In my experience, those who work on designing mobile sites take a highly UX-centric approach to their designs. You know what? That’s a great thing! However, sometimes other aspects of site design get left off the table, such as the discoverability of the content (though I’d argue discoverability of content is a big positive for UX, too).

To illustrate the point, we did a detailed analysis of one site using our own in-house crawler, which we used to crawl both the desktop and mobile versions of the site. From a top-level view, the results were as follows:

Summary of A Mobile vs a Desktop Crawl

Right away, we see that the mobile site has 1,021 fewer pages than the desktop version — so, roughly one-third of the desktop pages are “missing” on the mobile website. That’s a pretty big number! When we delve into why, we quickly find that files with “index.php” as part of the file name are where the mobile site is missing the most pages (1,016 fewer pages on the mobile site).

For this particular site, the index.php pages are the ones that define their category hierarchy, as well as their individual post pages. In looking into this further, I found that the desktop site had 705 different category pages, and the mobile site had only 54. Worse still, there is no category nav at all on the mobile site. In fact, the UX for navigating from one post to another looks like this (Note: This is not the real site, I’ve anonymized it):

Navigating by a Load More Button is a Bad Idea

When you click the button, it will show you the next few posts. Keeping in mind that this site’s blog has been active for a decade, the click depth gets quite deep:

Click Depth of 217 Clicks!

Google is pretty determined when it crawls websites, but it’s unlikely that it’s going to travel more than 30 clicks from the home page to find content. After all, no user is going to go that far, so all that content is pretty much invisible now.

Another interesting observation from this audit is that, on the mobile version of the site, each comment on the blog posts shows on its own URL. This is not true for the desktop site. This is actually a case where the mobile site is creating more pages than the desktop site, and it’s not a good idea, as many of the comment pages are relatively poor in content.

Last but not least, exactly as Google would fear, the desktop version of this site has structured data markup, and the mobile version doesn’t.

Summary

There is much more that I could share, but I think you already get the point. Note that from all the info Google shared, there are other major issues to be concerned about that weren’t exposed in this particular audit. However, other sites we’ve looked at have had these problems.

Google may be determined to make their rollout of the mobile-first index “quality neutral,” but they are going to face some major challenges. In the public tweet discussions, there was some indication that they may use a mixed model (signals from desktop and mobile) for a while.

For one thing, I don’t think there is any danger of links being replaced as a signal. There is no other signal that captures the concept of, “I value this third-party web page so much that I want to show it to my users, and I am willing to have them leave my site as a result.”

Personally, I’d bet we’re months away from the mobile-first index being a reality, but I could be wrong. Nonetheless, it’s incumbent on us to give Google some help. This is a great time to start working on an audit of your mobile site to see how it will stack up once the switch-over occurs.

Get yourself ready in advance, and you might just pick up some rankings benefits if your competition is slower about it than you are.

The post Do you know what a mobile crawl of your site looks like? appeared first on Search Engine Land.

AdWords Price Extensions now live on all devices

Google introduced Price Extensions in AdWords last July to show prices on types of products and services in text ads. The extensions are now eligible to show on all devices, not just mobile.

I haven’t seen them in the wild yet, but the example Google provided shows three price extensions in the desktop version.

This is similar to the cards used in the mobile format using swipeable cards that has been around since November.

With this change, advertisers now have the option of setting separate mobile URLs for price extensions.

The post AdWords Price Extensions now live on all devices appeared first on Search Engine Land.