Thursday, January 28, 2016

7 Traits That Will Make You A Great SEO

teamwork-merger-acquisition-ss-1920

It’s hard to believe, but as of this month, I’ve been the owner of an SEO and online marketing agency for 10 short, yet very long years.

If you’re reading this, you’re probably “in the industry,” or at least aspire to be — so you don’t need me to tell you how difficult it can be to attract and retain quality employees in an ever-evolving, high-stakes and fast-paced work environment.

It’s certainly something my leadership team and I have spent countless hours trying to figure out. It’s also one of the questions I get asked most often from colleagues in the industry: What makes a great SEO employee?

Though qualities like knowledge of HTML or information architecture are useful, the one thing SEO rock stars all have in common is that they seem to have certain “intangible” qualities. Personality traits like self-motivation, leadership and the constant thirst for knowledge top the lists and seem to be a predictor of long-term success.

While the Millennial generation, or Gen-Y, has a bit of a negative reputation among older professionals, there are many qualities that make them great employees — and make the SEO industry a perfect fit.

They’re looking for a challenge, to be constantly learning and to connect their work to a greater purpose. When hiring Millennials, keep in mind that you need to do your part as a company to engage these high-potential individuals.

Gen-Y will soon make up the majority of the workforce around the world. Recent research shows that by and large, Millennials are misunderstood by managers. Whether your company, like mine, already consists of a majority of Millennial employees or is on its way there, clearly defining the “intangibles” that your company values most will aid you in your hiring and retention.

On a suggestion from our hiring leads, we embarked on a mission to do exactly that: to figure out, and then put into words, the intangible qualities and values that make great employees at our organization. We came up with seven traits, which form the acronym CHARGED:

  1. Collaborative
  2. Hungry
  3. Agile
  4. Reliable
  5. Genuine
  6. Effective
  7. Dedicated

 

The SEO industry is full of smart people, some of whom have been doing this type of work for years. We’ve found that we can teach anyone the expertise to be successful, so long as they possess these values and traits. From there, skill in the area of SEO can be honed and refined with time and practice.

I’ll give some more context to how each of these seven traits can make an individual a highly effective SEO, as well as some interview tips for those of you looking to snag that coveted SEO position below.

Collaborative

To be an effective SEO, one can’t be a one-trick pony. Achieving optimal search engine presence (or better yet, dominance) is a collective effort involving a multitude of areas of expertise: technical SEO, on- and offsite factors, strong content marketing, strategic analysis of your target audience, great online PR, social media and more.

Maybe there are a few unicorns out there, but I don’t know many people who are stellar at all of those things. Being an effective SEO means you’re willing and able to collaborate with other experts and find ways to leverage their strengths to get results.

Approaching teamwork with a positive attitude is a complete must in our company (and should be in yours, too).

  • Greenlight: Be sure to look for candidates who provide real examples of their collaborative spirit by describing projects they worked on with others, highlighting their teammates’ contributions and the overall success. Candidates who talk about their learnings from a failed project or team assignment and key in on what they would do differently next time make for great team players.
  • Red flags: Candidates who bad mouth teammates or colleagues or place blame on others for failures are likely not willing to own their own contributions or play well with others.

Hungry

At the pace with which an agency moves, you need employees who are never satisfied with the status quo and who are always willing to better themselves, their work and the results they achieve. Hunger for continued knowledge and exploration is vital if you want your company to stay on the cutting edge.

  • Greenlight: Test for this value by asking candidates to describe something they recently taught themselves. Good candidates will have several answers to this question and will be able to describe how they did it and how it impacted their lives professionally and personally.
  • Red flags: Candidates who don’t have any questions throughout the interview process are likely lacking an innate curiosity and hunger for information.

Agile

In the world of SEO, you must accept the fact that you’re at Google’s mercy. It’s rare that we get advance notice of a big algorithm change or manual action sweep — which means our systems, tactics and most importantly, our people, have to be agile and adaptable to change.

Constant innovation and improvement should always be a goal if you want your company or agency to remain competitive. The only way to achieve that is to staff with agile people who understand the vision and can make it happen.

  • Greenlight: One way to test for agility is to ask your candidates to describe a challenging situation they’ve faced. Great candidates will describe how they approached the challenge, adjusted their strategy/tactics and ultimately learned something from the experience.
  • Red flags: Candidates who look at change as a negative or unwanted adjustment are not going to be agile enough to last in the SEO world.

Reliable

Nordstrom, known worldwide for its impeccable customer service, has literally one rule in its employee handbook: “Use good judgment in all situations.”

At any company, in any industry, you need to be sure you can trust your people. Clients need to be sure they can trust their SEO team to do the right thing.

The more the SEO landscape changes, the more important it is for SEOs to leave behind old practices that once moved the needle but can be detrimental today. Reliability isn’t doing the right thing once; it’s doing it consistently over time.

  • Greenlight: Candidates whose resumes demonstrate tenure with a company and a record of growth are sure signs of a highly reliable and trusted employee.
  • Red flags: Candidates whose resumes demonstrate a complete lack of commitment to a company, industry or interest may not be reliable in the long term.

Genuine

Your best employees will show an enthusiasm for the work and the company and go to bat for their ideas. In SEO, we frequently try something new only to fail or produce no results. When working with clients, your employees need to be able to own their mistakes, possess humility and laugh at themselves.

  • Greenlight: A candidate who can talk about a failure with humility is likely a good fit. Ask client-facing candidates how they’ve handled a situation that went badly.
  • Red flags: Believe it or not, we’ve actually had people admit they lied to a customer to cover a failure. If they’re willing to admit this in an interview, they’re highly likely to do it again. Transparency is important when clients are trusting you with their business.

Effective

SEO doesn’t matter if you don’t move the needle and see improvement in the metrics. Being results-oriented and understanding metrics is crucial to being effective, both in your career as an SEO and in getting results for your clients.

To be a great employee in an SEO agency, you also need to G.S.D. (get stuff done)! I think I can speak for all agencies when I say that the pace of work doesn’t leave us any room to micromanage you.

  • Greenlight: Our rock star employees have their own personal productivity methods, whether they’ve adopted the Getting Things Done methodology or simply created their own approach. Great candidates will be able to talk about how they keep themselves organized and can work independently.
  • Red flags: Candidates who don’t even mention a to-do list when talking about how they keep organized are a no-go. Also, candidates who’ve had no experience being held accountable to metrics or tangible results won’t make a good fit in this metrics- and results-driven industry.

Dedicated

Individuals who commit to their craft, company and clients are people you want on your team. You wouldn’t get married to someone without a commitment or show of dedication, right? Well, most of us wouldn’t.

Blind dedication to a cause or leader can be dangerous, which is why this value is listed last. An individual should possess the other traits listed above, as well as a dedication to embodying them on an ongoing basis.

  • Greenlight: You want to look for candidates whose definition of going above and beyond for their clients or colleagues matches up with yours.
  • Red flags: Candidates who answer the “above and beyond” question by describing a basic expectation don’t know what it means to be dedicated to results or their customers.

Influencing The Culture

Once we defined and documented our core values, we sought to also incorporate them organically into the agency culture. Our already vibrant “kudos board” in the common area was a great place to immediately apply these values and keep them top-of-mind.

We created new “kudos cards,” each outlining one of our core values (plus an eighth in the event you just want to give someone a kudos for being themselves and being awesome).

CHARGED-4

CHARGED-6

I would love to know your thoughts. Do your SEO colleagues have these traits, too? Or do you feel we left out an important intangible? Maybe you have something like this in place at your company and would like to share your story.

Here’s to another great 10 years. (2025, can you imagine?)

The post 7 Traits That Will Make You A Great SEO appeared first on Search Engine Land.

Google Updates The General Guidelines Section Of Their Webmaster Guidelines

google-jail-penalty2a-ss-1920

Google has quietly updated their Webmaster Guidelines document, which is one of the first places webmasters should go to when learning about SEO best practices and do’s and don’ts.

Google updated the general guidelines section of the document expanding on examples around how to help Google find your web pages, how to give them better ideas on what those pages are about and how to make web pages that are good for your web site visitors. The quality guidelines section of the page has not been updated.

Google also removed a line in the first section, the section read:

Following these guidelines will help Google find, index, and rank your site. Even if you choose not to implement any of these suggestions, we strongly encourage you to pay very close attention to the “Quality Guidelines.”

Now that section removed the “even if you chose not to implement any of these suggestions” and reads:

Following the General Guidelines below will help Google find, index, and rank your site.

We strongly encourage you to pay very close attention to the Quality Guidelines below…

Again, the quality guidelines did not change yet but the general guidelines did get a pretty big overhaul. I went through them line by line and nothing stands out as being mind-blowing. Google did go through the effort of adding a lot more content to this section, giving more examples, links to resources and reorganizing the list to coincide with what is most important to the end user.

I have taken before and after screen shots of the web page so you can compare yourself:

Before (also see it on the Google Cache while it lasts):

old-google-webmaster-guidelines

After:

new-google-webmaster-guidelines-expanded

Google revamped their Webmaster portal section the other week. This may be a continuation of those efforts.

Google has made many changes to the webmaster guidelines section over time, here are some of those:

The post Google Updates The General Guidelines Section Of Their Webmaster Guidelines appeared first on Search Engine Land.

Wednesday, January 27, 2016

SearchCap: Google AdWords Columns, Apple Street Views & FairSearch Funds

searchcap-header-v2-scap

Below is what happened in search today, as reported on Search Engine Land and from other places across the web.

From Search Engine Land:

  • Bing Adds Lottery & Powerball Numbers To Search Results
    Jan 27, 2016 by Barry Schwartz

    Did your odds just increase? Bing added winning lottery numbers to their quick answer box.

  • Brand Bidding & PPC Optimization: How We Got Here (Part 1 of 8)
    Jan 27, 2016 by Lori Weiman

    The biggest question facing paid search advertisers is how to get meaningful growth numbers out of PPC. Columnist Lori Weiman believes the answer lies with brand bidding.

  • Microsoft Pulls Funding For Anti-Google Lobbying Group FairSearch
    Jan 27, 2016 by Greg Sterling

    According to a report in Re/Code appearing last week, Microsoft has pulled financial support from FairSearch, an anti-Google “watchdog” or lobbying group that has been at the forefront of advancing European antitrust moves against the company. We sought comment from Microsoft when the report appeared, but the company declined to respond. The FairSearch site lists […]

  • Is Apple About To Launch A Competitor To Google Street View?
    Jan 27, 2016 by Greg Sterling

    Google Street View is a dramatic and sometimes useful feature of Google Maps that helped set it apart from competitors such as Nokia Maps and Bing Maps a few years ago. Now, there’s evidence that Apple may be seeking to create its own version of Street View. The following posting appears on Apple’s site: It […]

  • The State Of Cross-Channel Paid Search, Part 1: SEM & Social
    Jan 27, 2016 by Josh Dreller

    In this first in a series on cross-channel marketing, columnist Josh Dreller discusses how paid search and paid social efforts can work together to improve overall marketing efforts.

  • Math! Now Available Right In AdWords Custom Columns
    Jan 27, 2016 by Ginny Marvin

    Use formulas to get even more out of custom columns in Google AdWords.

  • Find Your Technology-Powered Solutions At MarTech. See Who’s Exhibiting.
    Jan 27, 2016 by Search Engine Land

    Join us at MarTech, where marketing meets IT. The strategy-packed agenda is only part of what makes MarTech an exceptional conference. The expo hall is packed with leading industry vendors waiting to provide you with the next tool or solution. Pass options are available. Register today!

Recent Headlines From Marketing Land, Our Sister Site Dedicated To Internet Marketing:

Search News From Around The Web:

Industry

Link Building

Searching

SEO

SEM / Paid Search

The post SearchCap: Google AdWords Columns, Apple Street Views & FairSearch Funds appeared first on Search Engine Land.

Bing Adds Lottery & Powerball Numbers To Search Results

lottery-balls-numbers-ss-1920

Bing announced you can now check to see if your lottery ticket matches the winning lottery numbers just by searching Bing.com. Weeks ago, both Bing and Google failed at showing lottery numbers in their search results.

Now you can search for [powerball] or [california lottery] and so on on Bing to pull up the quick answer box to show the winning lottery numbers for that specific lottery.

Here is a screen shot:

Powerball2

Just to be clear, Google Mexico does support Mexican lottery number winnings but they do not support U.S. based lotteries, yet.

Bing will also show you information about the lottery network and related lotteries so you can diversify your lottery odds.

The post Bing Adds Lottery & Powerball Numbers To Search Results appeared first on Search Engine Land.

Find Your Technology-Powered Solutions At MarTech. See Who’s Exhibiting.

Join us at MarTech, where marketing meets IT. The strategy-packed agenda is only part of what makes MarTech an exceptional conference. The expo hall is packed with leading industry vendors waiting to provide you with the next tool or solution. Pass options are available. Register today!

exhibitors_section_1_noborder

exhibitors_section_2_noborder

exhibitors_section_3_noborder

The post Find Your Technology-Powered Solutions At MarTech. See Who’s Exhibiting. appeared first on Search Engine Land.

Brand Bidding & PPC Optimization: How We Got Here (Part 1 of 8)

ppc-blue-mobile-ss-1920

Welcome to part 1 of a series for search marketers on brand bidding and PPC optimization. This series will answer the biggest question facing PPC advertisers in 2016: How do I get meaningful growth numbers out of a crowded and competitive PPC market?

Unless you are completely new to PPC, it is tough to get the big gains that we once saw. As a marketing tactic, PPC has been mature for years, and few “easy wins” still remain. Many categories are dominated by large players (e.g., Amazon), long-tail keywords have become expensive, and the most advanced marketers have complex technology and expensive agencies on their side.

When you look at CPC data from Google, however, you hear a different story. Their 2014 10K stock filing shows a decline of eight percent in aggregate CPCs across their entire network from 2012 to 2013, and five percent from 2013 to 2014.

Look at just AdWords, and just the all-important first-page bid, and you see a different picture. First-page bid costs keep rising for both branded terms (+300 percent from mid-2014 to mid-2015) and non-branded ones (+75 percent for the same period), as RKG/Merkle showed in 2015.

Further, many advertisers still struggle with how (and whether) to bid on their own keywords. Bing released data at the end of 2015 showing that when advertisers bid on their branded terms, they received 31 percent more clicks (for retail ads) and 27 percent more clicks (for travel ads).

The Bing data recommended a strong brand defense to save lost clicks. Their data showed that when a retail brand did not bid on its branded searches, 34 percent of the missed clicks went to other ads, and six percent went to other organic listings.

With first-page CPCs on the rise, however, advertisers are tempted to look for any opportunity possible to reduce costs, and sometimes brand campaigns end up getting the axe.

So how do PPC marketers achieve meaningful growth today?

Brand Bidding: Your Secret Weapon

At The Search Monitor (Disclosure: my employer), we’ve found a promising solution: brand bidding. Or better said, the process of running an effective brand-bidding strategy focused on revenue growth and protection.

This solution didn’t arrive overnight. My company reviews ad monitoring data for thousands of branded searches. We’ve verified that competition for branded keywords is on the rise. If our clients simply do nothing, the result has been higher CPCs, lower average rankings, and even instances of advertisers and partners unknowingly working against each other.

Our data has revealed that executing a proper brand bidding strategy provides incredible value to an advertiser. We see that:

  • Consumers love branded searches. The volume of branded searches is quite impressive. Using the AdWords Keyword Planner, for example, we see that in December 2015 alone, there were 24 million US searches for “macys” and 850K US searches for “Macys jackets.”
  • Branded searches convert well for brands. Advertisers receive a large portion of their traffic from branded searches. One of The Search Monitor’s clients, a well-known travel brand, shared that by sponsoring their brand terms they were able to capture two-thirds of the paid search clicks generated by those branded keywords. In other words, if this client were not to sponsor its brand, then it would be giving up 66% of the clicks on its brand terms to competitors.
  • Clicks decrease rapidly with more competition. Our data show that brand owners can lose 50 percent of their click potential as competitors increase.
  • CPCs increase significantly with more competition. We also see that CPCs can jump more than 60 percent when competitors vie for the top three spots.
  • Affiliate competitors distort metrics. Affiliates can throw off bid automation and conversion metrics by 20 percent or more.

Brand bidding as a tool for PPC growth became more evident during a panel I sat on at the Search Insider Summit in late 2015. The panel focused on the monetary gains from both brand advertising and protection. It also featured representatives from Marriott Hotels and their search agency.

As we each shared our experience with brand bidding, it became quite clear that we all shared the same perspective: the volume of brand bidding is on the rise, it requires considerable effort and focus to combat it, and brand protection in PPC can produce giant revenue results.

When I say “giant” results, I mean exactly that. Some of our bigger brand clients have told us that their strategy of protecting branded searches has earned them (or saved from loss) hundreds of millions of dollars annually worldwide.

As I share this message — and especially the revenue figures — with advertisers, the response has typically been: “We’re seeing the same thing, but we don’t know what to do.”

This Series: A Guide To Effectively Managing Brand Bidding

As a result, I created this educational series. The series will provide search marketers with a detailed understanding of brand bidding and how it should be managed to drive meaningful PPC growth. The series will be divided into eight parts:

  1. Historical Context Of PPC Optimization (See below): I will discuss the evolution of PPC optimization from past to present, showing how brand bidding is the natural next step in this evolution.
  2. Keywords: Once the historical groundwork is laid, it’s time to discuss the branded keywords themselves. This will be a metrics-driven article using The Search Monitor’s ad monitoring data covering brand and brand-plus keywords and their value to the advertiser.
  3. Best Practices: Once keywords are analyzed for brand bidding and unwanted competition, it’s easy to make recommendations. This article will provide best practices in both quick responses and longer-term protective measures for your branded searches.
  4. Partner Relationships: This article will describe one of the most effective brand bidding tactics: working with affiliates and partners to coordinate brand bidding and bolster your brand.
  5. Addressing Competition: This article will share tips on how to deflate the rising costs associated with competition on your branded searches. I will discuss tactics such as copywriting, landing page development, rank and bids.
  6. Legal Responses: Yes, there are legal recourses to reduce competitors on your branded searches. This article will discuss what the law says and how to make it work in your favor, and it will describe responses such as submitting complaints to the engines.
  7. Effective Brand Bidding Techniques: Brand bidding can be very productive if done appropriately. This article will explain how to effectively bid on other advertisers’ brands and will show a few examples of larger brands who have figured out the winning formula.
  8. The Future Of Brand Bidding: The brand bidding series will conclude with a summary of every tip previously discussed, as well as advice on how to keep your brand bidding strategy flexible in 2016 to adjust for inevitable changes.

The Historical Context Of PPC Optimization (Part 1)

The history of PPC is a short but intense journey. It started less than 20 years ago, in 1998, when GoTo.com introduced the pay-per-click concept at a TED conference. The company later turned into Overture and then was bought by Yahoo in 2003. Google, meanwhile, jumped into search in 1999 with 350 initial advertisers. A year later, it launched AdWords, then introduced a PPC version of AdWords in 2002.

The search engine landscape at that time was filled with lots of engines with even funnier names than Google. Remember FindWhat, Kanoodle, and LookSmart? Further, the notion of a black box of advertiser data hadn’t taken hold yet. Advertisers could see everyone’s bids, which the search engines hoped would drive up bidding

Eight years of fast growth went by before Yahoo and Microsoft teamed up in 2010 to offer PPC advertising across both search properties (Yahoo! Search and Bing) under a single ad platform, as an alternative to Google AdWords. Even in 2010, keyword costs remained low.

As competition increased, search marketers looked for ways to optimize their campaigns. In fact, “optimization” became a giant buzzword in PPC. Looking back, I have noticed five distinct cycles in PPC optimization, each with an increasing degree of difficulty. As you read through these five below, ask yourself where you think you currently are — and where you’d like to be.

Cycle 1: Keyword Lists

This initial optimization tactic was focused on the breadth of your keyword list. It was relatively easy because everything was new. Keywords were cheap! When pay-per-click was introduced, quality, decent-volume keywords could be purchased for five cents or less. Even five years later, a search marketer who bid more than a few dollars on a click would be laughed at.

With bid prices so low, search marketers were happy to experiment with the new channel. It was a learning environment, and competition remained low for years. Gains in revenue were tremendous as a result.

In 2011, Google reached approximately one million businesses advertising on its site. Bid prices followed the rise in competition, especially for the deep-pocket spenders. In 2011, the most expensive CPCs were paid by insurance companies. In 2015, law firms took the title, as certain clicks related to the health condition mesothelioma were priced at more than $1,000.

Cycle 2: Analytics

After building an exhaustive keyword list, marketers focused on their performance analytics for PPC optimization. They studied CTRs, conversion rates, CPCs and anything else they could monitor, then tweaked their strategies ever so subtly.

Google acquired Urchin Software Corp. in 2005 in response to advertisers’ increasing need for detailed performance data. Entire analytics departments were founded to process the huge volumes of click and spend data and find the next opportunity for optimization. As budgets increased, marketing executives started demanding more ROI and ROAS focus and wanted to see better attribution between click and sale.

The addition of advanced analytics enabled PPC gains to remain considerable.

Cycle 3: Bid Automation

After analytics, advances in technology made it easier to automate many of the huge data chores associated with optimization. In particular, the automation of bids let advertisers change their costs in real time to reflect changes in product costs or consumer demand.

Millions of PPC bids could be controlled by bid automation systems, and the quality of the data inputs (the analytics) became even more vital to PPC optimization. This new technology helped usher in the next cycle in PPC optimization.

Cycle 4: Pruning

After gains from analytics and automation were exhausted, the seasoned marketer took an even closer look at their campaigns for available refinements in performance.

Engines were constantly rolling out new optimization features for advertisers, and the popular ones were negative match, search queries and other cost analysis tools. They used these to prune out the big cost drivers that didn’t deliver the performance. Another huge leap of gains happened in cost optimization.

Cycle 5: Relevancy

The most recent cycle in PPC optimization occurred when marketers optimized their campaigns against the new arena of Quality Scores and search engine mandates for relevance.

The engines value greater relevancy at all costs and have rewarded those marketers that complied with cheaper CPCs.

Brand Bidding As The Next Cycle

Fast forward to the present day, and marketers are looking for the next tool or technique to generate large gains from PPC performance. This series will introduce the notion that brand bidding is the next cycle in PPC optimization.

The brand bidding genie is out of the bottle, and you now know the secret to driving meaningful PPC growth in 2016. I hope you’ll stay along for the ride as we dive deeper into the huge revenue potential offered by a successful brand bidding strategy.

The post Brand Bidding & PPC Optimization: How We Got Here (Part 1 of 8) appeared first on Search Engine Land.

Microsoft Pulls Funding For Anti-Google Lobbying Group FairSearch

google-legal1-color-ss-1920

According to a report in Re/Code appearing last week, Microsoft has pulled financial support from FairSearch, an anti-Google “watchdog” or lobbying group that has been at the forefront of advancing European antitrust moves against the company. We sought comment from Microsoft when the report appeared, but the company declined to respond.

The FairSearch site lists current members: Admarketplace.com, Allegro, Buscapé, Expedia, Foundem, Nokia, Oracle, Trip Advisor and Twenga. Microsoft is no longer among them.

The withdrawal of financial support by Microsoft may reflect a kinder, gentler Redmond under the leadership of CEO Satya Nadella versus more combative predecessor Steve Ballmer. Or it could reflect the notion that Microsoft accomplished what it sought out to do with the organization.

Fairsearch members 2012

Microsoft is apparently not the only FairSearch member to pull out. In 2012, the group’s membership (above) also featured a few more companies than it has today, including Kayak (owned by Priceline). At least a couple of group’s members may have been lost to acquisitions — TheFind was bought by Facebook, SideStep was acquired by Kayak. Others appear to have stopped participating, though Hotwire is owned by Expedia (still a member).

FairSearch was founded in 2010 and was instrumental in arguing against and helping defeat the “rival links” antitrust settlement proposal that had been worked out between then European Commission chief Joaquín Almunia and Google.

The post Microsoft Pulls Funding For Anti-Google Lobbying Group FairSearch appeared first on Search Engine Land.